Paid family leave is not an issue or idea that naturally comes to conservatives.
In one sense, it's a form of paying people not to work. In another, it's a matter of paying people to remain available for work and later resume a normal employee role.
Shifting an employment relationship that doesn't already include this to later including it raises several questions. Is this another unfunded mandate on the employer? Is this a new tax-and-spend benefit from the government? The money would have to come from somewhere.
I would prefer less of a role for both government and employer in people's lives. Government should stick to punishing those who do evil and praising those who do good. Employers would do well to simply pay people out of the value they provide.
That understood, as long as this issue has traction, it's worth listening to what people are saying and what those with power are considering.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Referral Link
Have you looked at mobile phone service carrier Tello?
- Great affordable plans (like $10/month for unlimited talk/text, 1 GB of data)
- useful app for making calls if out of range
- start with $10 free
Disclosure
Blog Archive
-
▼
2018
(187)
-
▼
July
(31)
- Awana Prime Day
- Deadline = Extreme Focus
- “Why do you stand gazing up into heaven?”
- Congress Updates
- 10 Traits of True Leaders
- Glorifying God in Furniture Arrangements
- Self-Flying Cars
- Consolidating
- Paid Family Leave
- “Lord willing”
- Congress Updates
- Why Learn
- “A very dangerous word”
- Daylight Light Bulbs
- Shadow of Turning
- Family History-Keeping
- $0.99 x 15+
- Congress Updates
- Day 13
- Capitol Hill Events
- Venezuela
- The Original Monday
- Diet & Weight
- Caves in the Scriptures
- Saturday Surround
- Itty Bitty Sites
- Hitchhikers
- Gospel Tracts
- Rhetorical Gray
- Conversation Topic Options
- Creation Patterns
-
▼
July
(31)
No comments:
Post a Comment