SCOTUS Updates

.@USSupremeCourt To Hear Case On Sealed Mueller Evidence https://t.co/zTD31xaqYv — […]

@ReutersLegal: U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump appeal over Russia report documents https://t.co/MqnrnszY1j https://t.co/AQZbgSK8Lf — […]

@ReutersLegal: U.S. Supreme Court takes up Nestle, Cargill appeals over human rights claims https://t.co/mNL2dnwAZu https://t.co/307SHGwL2w — […]

@ReutersLegal: U.S. Supreme Court sends Indiana abortion cases back to lower courts https://t.co/FWiLCIqDRV https://t.co/TSTEfYTA81 — […]

@ReutersLegal: U.S. Supreme Court takes up Germany's appeal in Nazi art dispute https://t.co/cPgD98WsVr — […]

@news_ntd: The #SupremeCourt agreed to consider the #Trump admin’s appeal of a lower court’s decision compelling @TheJusticeDept to give Congress documents from former Special Counsel Robert #Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. https://t.co/VJDt7InWr1 — […]

@PrivacyPros: "Facebook asks SCOTUS to intervene in privacy lawsuit" (via @DailyDashboard) https://t.co/UIKSHWF24x cc: @MediaPost https://t.co/2jlnbhDNJf — […]

@USSupremeCourt: The Fourth Circuit’s judgment—that the robocall restriction’s government-debt exception in 47 U. S. C. §227(b)(1)(A)(iii) violates the First Amendment but is severable from the remainder of the statute—is affirmed. — […]

@USSupremeCourt: OPINION: Chiafalo v. Washington (19-465) https://t.co/rU5nxkDwci A State may enforce an elector’s pledge to support his party’s nominee—and the state voters’ choice—for President. — […]

Binding faithless electors https://t.co/2vf1Mejub2 (WORLD) — […]

@2Aupdates: New Supreme Court case Zoie v Nebraska (#SCOTUS, 19-1418): Cert petition https://t.co/JhaviVXMNP https://t.co/9LxGTEmfXQ — […]

@AllianceDefends: BREAKING: US Supreme Court asked to halt NV governor’s rules that treat churches worse than casinos ADF attorneys represent church challenging unbalanced coronavirus restrictions that allow more people to play slots than gather for worship Read more: https://t.co/vJyantrnHc https://t.co/ufw6mSqYtc — […]

@USSupremeCourt: OPINION: Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru https://t.co/Kdrak1G4bn ALITO, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, BREYER, KAGAN, GORSUCH, and KAVANAUGH, JJ., joined. — […]

@scotusreporter: In first opinion today, Supreme Court says two teachers who wanted to sue their parochial schools employers may not because of the "ministerial exception" protecting religious institutions — […]

@USSupremeCourt: OPINION: Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania (19-431) https://t.co/UKDlUFktPQ THOMAS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and ALITO, GORSUCH, and KAVANAUGH, JJ., joined. — […]

@KevinDaleyDC: BREAKING: The Supreme Court upholds the Trump administration's conscience exemptions from the Obamacare birth control mandate in victory for the Little Sisters of the Poor. Justice Thomas has the Court's opinion. The judgment is 7-2. #SCOTUS https://t.co/k4SXaigMrD — […]

Supreme Court upholds contraceptive exemption https://t.co/DPurKoPcC3 (WORLD) — […]

@NRBtoday: SCOTUS Delivers Major Wins for Religious Liberty with Rulings on Our Lady of Guadalupe and Little Sisters of the Poor Cases https://t.co/zhI5AOwkJ6 https://t.co/6woBGyZNZM — […]

Religious schools keep the right to hire for beliefs https://t.co/DVeLVMNRwD (WORLD) — […]

Victory for the Little Sisters https://t.co/uABH9yQLql (WORLD) — […]

@USSupremeCourt: OPINION: McGirt v. Oklahoma (18-9526) https://t.co/o5xrOkJ701 GORSUCH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GINSBURG, BREYER, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN, JJ., joined. — […]

@USSupremeCourt: OPINION: Trump v. Vance (19-635) https://t.co/6CzTEnZI5a ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GINSBURG, BREYER, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN, JJ., joined. KAVANAUGH, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which GORSUCH, J., joined. — […]

@USSupremeCourt: OPINION: Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP (19-715) https://t.co/Ig5BaVKVKP The courts below did not take adequate account of the significant separation of powers concerns implicated by congressional subpoenas for the President’s information. — […]

@tsspangler: Justice Thomas dissent to tax records: "The subpoena ... here is unprecedented. Never before has a local prosecutor subpoenaed the records of a sitting President. The Court’s decision threatens to impair the functioning of the Presidency" — […]

2019 term concluded: Complete list of 2019 cases, opinions and summaries